Grading State Disclosure 2004 Logo Graphic

N e w . Y o r k

Grade
Rank
D
30

golden bar divider

Subcategories
Grade
Rank
Campaign Disclosure Law
D
38
Electronic Filing Program
A+
1
Disclosure Content Accessibility
C-
22
Online Contextual & Technical Usability
F
41

Grading Process green cube Subcategory Weighting green cube Methodology green cube Glossary

golden bar divider

The State of Disclosure in New York

New York again received an overall D for its campaign disclosure program, but its rank dropped from 25 to 30 because of improvements made in the rest of the country.  The state’s strongest category is again Electronic Filing, and its weakest performance is still in the area of web site usability.

New York law requires candidates to file twice in non-election years and twice before each election.  Candidates must provide detailed information about contributors who give $99 or more, but neither occupation nor employer information is disclosed.  Last-minute contributions of $1,000 or more must be disclosed prior to the election.  Expenditures of $50 or more, including subvendor information, must be reported, but there is no disclosure of independent expenditures.  Electronic filing is mandatory for all statewide and legislative candidates who file with the State Board of Elections, and the agency reported that it is in the process of enhancing its web-based filing system to include all types of statements.

While its Disclosure Content Accessibility grade improved slightly, New York’s rank in this category dropped from 19 to 22, as other states moved forward with significant advancements in data accessibility.  The strength of the State Board of Elections web site is that it features a searchable database of contributions that is both comprehensive (paper-filed records are manually entered into the system) and up-to-date.  However, the system lacks search capability, as described in this study last year, and there is no corresponding database of expenditure information.  The two most important changes that could be made to New York’s disclosure web site are adding an expenditures search and increasing the number of fields by which the contributions data can be searched.

Online Contextual and Technical Usability is the category in which New York has the most significant room for improvement.  While the disclosure site does include a comprehensive list of candidates, a thorough description of whose reports are online, and information about the state’s disclosure requirements, it is still missing important overview information to help people easily compare the campaign finance activity of various candidates.  Additionally, New York’s score in the usability testing dropped in 2004.  The agency recently redesigned its web site, but not until after the close of this project’s web site review period, so the redesign will be evaluated as part of Grading State Disclosure 2005.

Disclosure Agency: State Board of Elections
Disclosure Web Site:
http://www.elections.state.ny.us

Back to the Grading State Disclosure home page

View another state's summary:

 


This page was first published on October 25, 2004
| Last updated on October 25, 2004
copyright ©
Campaign Disclosure Project. All rights reserved.