Grading State Disclosure 2004 Logo Graphic

M a s s a c h u s e t t s

Grade
Rank
C+
12

golden bar divider

Subcategories
Grade
Rank
Campaign Disclosure Law
D+
36
Electronic Filing Program
A+
1
Disclosure Content Accessibility
B
14
Online Contextual & Technical Usability
B-
10

Grading Process green cube Subcategory Weighting green cube Methodology green cube Glossary

golden bar divider

The State of Disclosure in Massachusetts

There have been few changes to Massachusetts’ disclosure program in the past year and the state again received a C+, but its overall rank fell from three to twelve because other states have made considerable progress.

Under Massachusetts law, candidates must file one report in non-election years and one before each election.  Candidates are required to provide detailed information for all contributions of $50 or more, including occupation and employer for those who give more than $200.  Information about all expenditures of $50 or more must be disclosed, but subvendor information does not have to be reported.  Independent expenditures must be disclosed but there is no pre-election reporting of either last-minute independent expenditures or last-minute contributions.  Electronic filing is mandatory for statewide candidates who reach a $50,000 threshold and legislative candidates who reach a $5,000 threshold.

Along with its electronic filing program, Massachusetts’ strength lies in Disclosure Content Accessibility.  The Office of Campaign and Political Finance web site features databases of contributions and expenditures that allow “smart searches” and sorting on a number of fields.  Adding a zip code field to the contributor search, along with description and amount fields to the expenditures search, would enhance the databases.  Access to paper copies of reports is average compared to other states and could be improved.

Massachusetts’ web site usability grade is still a B-, but its rank fell as other states made significant strides in usability.  Summary information comparing the campaign finance activity of both current and past candidates is the highlight of the site’s contextual information.  A component of the database called “Report Status” and a list of the most recently filed campaign reports help site visitors determine whose reports are available online.  The list of candidates has improved, but is still missing party affiliation information.  Massachusetts’s score in the usability testing was average and was the main reason the state received a B rather than an A in this category.

Disclosure Agency: Office of Campaign and Political Finance
Disclosure Web Site:
http://www.state.ma.us/ocpf

Back to the Grading State Disclosure home page

View another state's summary:

 


This page was first published on October 25, 2004
| Last updated on October 25, 2004
copyright ©
Campaign Disclosure Project. All rights reserved.