Grading State Disclosure 2004 Logo Graphic

A r k a n s a s

Grade
Rank
F
40

golden bar divider

Subcategories
Grade
Rank
Campaign Disclosure Law
C
29
Electronic Filing Program
F
39
Disclosure Content Accessibility
F
41
Online Contextual & Technical Usability
F
38

Grading Process green cube Subcategory Weighting green cube Methodology green cube Glossary

golden bar divider

The State of Disclosure in Arkansas

Arkansas’ low rank and overall F persist in spite of its C in the law category, mainly because of continued poor accessibility of campaign finance information, another F in web site usability – even though improvements have been made in that area – and a lack of electronic filing.

Arkansas requires candidates to file campaign finance reports quarterly in non-election years and monthly in election years.  Candidates must file detailed contributor information, including occupation and employer, for contributions of $50 or more and detailed expenditure information for payments of $100 or more, although subvendor information is not required.  A major weakness in the state’s disclosure law is that the filing schedule allows last-minute contributions and independent expenditures to be hidden from voters until after the election.  The state has not made progress toward electronic filing.

The strength of the Secretary of State’s web site is that it contains all state candidates’ campaign finance reports dating back to 1996, and those reports are scanned and posted relatively quickly.  However, the usefulness of the reports is severely limited because they are only available in PDF, which means that itemized data cannot be searched, sorted, or downloaded.  Making even a portion of the campaign finance records – statewide candidates, for example – available in a more accessible format would be a major improvement.  The agency does well in providing the public with access to paper copies of disclosure records, however at $.25 per page the cost is at the higher end of what other states are charging.

While Arkansas has made improvements to the usability of its disclosure web site and now ranks at 38 rather than 47, the site is still well below the standard for Contextual and Technical Usability set by the top states in the study.  There are still no lists of the total amounts raised and spent by state candidates, and there is no thorough explanation of whose records and which reports are available online.  On the bright side, the agency has added information about the state’s disclosure requirements and campaign finance restrictions, a site restructuring resulted in better terminology, and it became much easier to locate the campaign disclosure site from the state’s main web site.

Disclosure Agency: Secretary of State
Disclosure Web Site:
http://www.sosweb.state.ar.us

Back to the Grading State Disclosure home page

View another state's summary:

 


This page was first published on October 25, 2004
| Last updated on October 25, 2004
copyright ©
Campaign Disclosure Project. All rights reserved.