Grading State Disclosure 2005 Logo Graphic

W i s c o n s i n

Grade
Rank
C-
30

golden bar divider

Subcategories
Grade
Rank
Campaign Disclosure Law
B
15
Electronic Filing Program
A
16
Disclosure Content Accessibility
F
37
Online Contextual & Technical Usability
D-
34

Grading Process green cube Subcategory Weighting green cube Methodology green cube Glossary

golden bar divider

The State of Disclosure in Wisconsin

Wisconsin again earned a C- in 2007, but dropped eight places in the overall rankings as other states improved.

Wisconsin earned a B and ranked 15th in the disclosure law category in 2007. The law requires candidates to disclose detailed information about contributors giving over $20, including occupation and employer data for those giving over $100. Candidates must disclose expenditures over $20, but reports do not include subvendor details. Both last-minute contributions and independent expenditures must be reported prior to Election Day, but Wisconsin requires fewer pre-election reports than most other states. Wisconsin’s electronic filing program earned an A again in 2007 and is mandatory for both statewide and legislative candidates raising $20,000 or more. Candidates currently file disclosure reports with the State Elections Board. In the future, disclosure reports will be filed with the Government Accountability Board, which was established in 2007 and is in the process of assuming the disclosure responsibilities of the State Elections Board as well as those of the State Ethics Board.

Wisconsin received an F again for Disclosure Content Accessibility in 2007, while slipping three places in the rankings since 2005. Electronically-filed campaign data can be downloaded from the State Elections Board’s web site, but only summary data for paper filers is available online. Filings are made available within 48 hours of receipt. The lack of online, searchable databases of campaign contributions and expenditures is the main deficiency of the site. The state has solicited proposals for a new campaign finance information system that may, once developed, provide greater access to disclosure information online.

Wisconsin’s lower usability test performance in 2007 brought the state’s Online Contextual and Technical Usability grade down from a D to a D-. Most testers had trouble finding specific data, and found the disclosure site very confusing, leading to lower overall ratings in 2007. The structure of the site may be a factor in the low usability test performance, as it is not immediately clear where campaign finance data can be located online. Currently, users who want to search for campaign data must follow a link labeled “Electronic Finance Reports” to access that data. Some of the valuable contextual information that can be found on the site includes state disclosure requirements and analyses of campaign finance trends.

Quick Fix: Provide a clear and prominent link to disclosure data on the main campaign finance page.

Editor’s Pick: Contribution limits for state candidates are clearly described in a chart that is easily located on the disclosure web site. View image

Disclosure Agency: State Elections Board
Disclosure Web Site:
http://elections.state.wi.us

View past summaries of this state

View another state's summary:

Back to the Grading State Disclosure home page


First published October 16, 2007
| Last updated October 17, 2007
copyright ©
Campaign Disclosure Project. All rights reserved.