Grading State Disclosure 2005 Logo Graphic

W a s h i n g t o n

Grade
Rank
A-
1

golden bar divider

Subcategories
Grade
Rank
Campaign Disclosure Law
A-
3
Electronic Filing Program
A+
1
Disclosure Content Accessibility
A+
1
Online Contextual & Technical Usability
C
16

Grading Process green cube Subcategory Weighting green cube Methodology green cube Glossary

golden bar divider

The State of Disclosure in Washington

Washington has again proven its excellence in campaign finance disclosure practices, earning an A- and ranking 1st overall for the fourth time in the Grading State Disclosure assessment. Washington remains a national leader in the Electronic Filing and Disclosure Content Accessibility categories, and its disclosure law ranks third in the nation.

Washington requires candidates to report detailed information about contributors giving over $25, including occupation and employer data for those donating over $100. Last-minute contributions must be reported prior to Election Day. Campaign expenditure disclosure is also strong, with candidates required to report detailed information about vendors, subvendors and accrued expenses. Independent expenditures are disclosed, and those made in the 21 days leading up to an election must be reported within 24 hours. Electronic filing is mandatory for candidates spending over $10,000, and the Public Disclosure Commission (PDC) provides regular filer trainings and free filing software, which recently became compatible with the Macintosh computer platform.

Washington earned an A+ and maintained its place at the top of the Disclosure Content Accessibility rankings in 2007. Visitors to the PDC web site have the option to both browse disclosure filings or search a comprehensive database of itemized contributions and expenditures. The database offers a wide range of search fields and results can be sorted online or downloaded. Electronically-filed reports are available online immediately after they are filed, and paper filings are posted online the same day they are received. Access to paper copies of disclosure records is excellent, and the agency also offers data on CD for just $2.

The one area where Washington needs to improve is in web site usability; the state earned a C in this category in 2007, dropping from a B- in 2005 and an A- in 2004. The lower 2007 grade is due primarily to a weaker usability test performance. Testers took longer to find specific data than testers did in 2005, and most testers reported confusion with site terminology. To address the needs of all site visitors (from novice to advanced), the PDC is designing a new data search system geared toward new users that will complement the existing search system. There have been some contextual improvements; the PDC added the dates covered by each disclosure report to the index of candidate reports. The disclosure site offers excellent information about campaign finance rules and restrictions, summaries of the totals raised and spent by candidates and overviews of campaign finance trends going back to 1998.

Quick Fix: Provide a glossary of the forms that can be accessed from the “View Actual Reports” section of the site. Site visitors may be confused by form names, such as “C3” (itemized contributions) or “A” (itemized expenses).

Editor’s Pick: The database search page includes multiple search fields and options for sorting and downloading the search results. View image

Disclosure Agency: Public Disclosure Commission
Disclosure Web Site:
http://www.pdc.wa.gov

View past summaries of this state

View another state's summary:

Back to the Grading State Disclosure home page


First published October 16, 2007
| Last updated November 17, 2007
copyright ©
Campaign Disclosure Project. All rights reserved.