Grading State Disclosure 2005 Logo Graphic

T e x a s

Grade
Rank
B-
17

golden bar divider

Subcategories
Grade
Rank
Campaign Disclosure Law
B-
19
Electronic Filing Program
A+
1
Disclosure Content Accessibility
A
3
Online Contextual & Technical Usability
F
39

Grading Process green cube Subcategory Weighting green cube Methodology green cube Glossary

golden bar divider

The State of Disclosure in Texas

Texas again earned a B- in 2007, though the state slipped out of the top ten in the rankings as other states improved. Despite some contextual improvements made to the Texas Ethics Commission’s web site, the state slipped again in the usability testing and its grade in this area dropped from a D- to an F in 2007.

Texas earned a B- in 2007, and ranked 19th in the Campaign Disclosure Law category. Candidates must disclose detailed information about contributors giving more than $50, including occupation and employer data for donors giving $500 or more. All expenditures over $50 are reported, but reports do not include information about subvendor payments or accrued expenses. Texas requires last-minute contributions and last-minute independent expenditures to be disclosed before Election Day. Upon recommendations from the Texas Ethics Commission Task Force, the legislature passed laws in 2007 to strengthen pre-election and last-minute reporting requirements, and extended civil penalties to last-minute reporting violations. Texas earned an A+ and a share in the top national ranking for its mandatory electronic filing program, which covers all state-level candidates who reach a $20,000 threshold.

Texas is a national leader in terms of accessibility to disclosure data, again earning an A in this area in 2007. The Commission posts all campaign reports online within 24 hours of receipt, and offers online, searchable databases of contributions and expenditures that have been filed electronically. While searches cannot be conducted by expenditure purpose, the database contains many other search fields, as well as options for sorting and downloading disclosure data. Additionally, the display of itemized search results contains a helpful link from each transaction to the filer’s complete disclosure report.

Despite efforts by the Texas Ethics Commission to improve the disclosure web site, the state received a lower usability test rating for the second consecutive assessment. Only one tester was able to locate the disclosure site from the Texas state homepage in 2007. The Commission has improved the terminology used on the site, provides better descriptions of the data available, and added a link to the Secretary of State’s site to allow easier identification of candidates. Providing a list of candidates directly on the Commission’s site would give the public easier access to this important contextual information.

Quick Fix: Create a clearer path to the Ethics Commission web site from the Texas state homepage. There are a number of logical options for placing a link to “campaign finance information” on the state homepage, such as from the “Voting” or “Government” sections.

Editor’s Pick: Simple and advanced search options, and contribution and expenditure search fields, are all integrated into one database search screen. View image

Disclosure Agency: Texas Ethics Commission
Disclosure Web Site:
http://www.ethics.state.tx.us

View past summaries of this state

View another state's summary:

Back to the Grading State Disclosure home page


First published October 16, 2007
| Last updated October 17, 2007
copyright ©
Campaign Disclosure Project. All rights reserved.