Grading State Disclosure 2005 Logo Graphic

R h o d e . I s l a n d

Grade
Rank
B
12

golden bar divider

Subcategories
Grade
Rank
Campaign Disclosure Law
C
32
Electronic Filing Program
A+
1
Disclosure Content Accessibility
A
4
Online Contextual & Technical Usability
C+
13

Grading Process green cube Subcategory Weighting green cube Methodology green cube Glossary

golden bar divider

The State of Disclosure in Rhode Island

Along with another strong performance in the accessibility category, gains made in the Electronic Filing and web site usability categories bumped Rhode Island up to a solid B in 2007. However, the state dropped out of the top ten overall while other states made greater gains.

Rhode Island’s disclosure law earned a C again in 2007, and requires that candidates disclose detailed information about contributors giving at least $100, including employer but not occupation data or cumulative amount donated. Loan disclosure is a weak point as is late contribution reporting; candidates who do not participate in the state’s public financing program are not required to disclose last-minute contributions until after Election Day. Expenditures over $100 must be disclosed, but reports do not include subvendor information. Electronic filing has been mandatory in Rhode Island for statewide candidates for several years; legislative candidates raising $5,000 were scheduled to be required to file electronically in 2004 as well. However, implementation was delayed and legislative candidates were not required to file electronically until 2007. Despite a legislative challenge to the mandate by state lawmakers in 2007, the mandatory program remains in place and earned the state an A+ in the Electronic Filing category.

Rhode Island continued to perform very well in the Disclosure Content Accessibility category, and earned an A and a top five ranking in 2007. The Board of Elections provides excellent access to candidates’ campaign filings, and features comprehensive, searchable databases of contribution and expenditure data on its web site. The only thing missing from those databases is the ability to search expenditure records by purpose, even though this information can be accessed through the search results. Electronically-filed disclosure reports are posted on the Internet immediately and are followed by scanned copies of paper-filings within five days.

While little has changed on the state’s disclosure site, usability testers were more easily able to find data online than in 2005, which boosted Rhode Island’s Online Contextual and Technical Usability grade to a C+ in 2007. Testers generally felt confident in their ability to find specific, accurate data, and gave the site a good overall rating. The index of candidate reports is detailed and shows not only up-to-date original and amended reports, but also provides due dates for reports required in the future. The online contextual information could be improved by providing overviews of campaign financing trends that compare totals raised and spent by competing candidates, or by providing additional details about the data available online, such as the time period covered.

Quick Fix: Add a list of the total amounts raised and spent by all candidates, organized by office.

Editor’s Pick: The index of a candidate’s reports shows the reporting period, due date and the actual date that each report was submitted, as well as future reporting dates. View image

Disclosure Agency: Board of Elections
Disclosure Web Site:
http://www.elections.state.ri.us

View past summaries of this state

View another state's summary:

Back to the Grading State Disclosure home page


First published October 16, 2007
| Last updated October 17, 2007
copyright © Campaign Disclosure Project. All rights reserved.