Grading State Disclosure 2005 Logo Graphic

O r e g o n

Grade
Rank
B+
3

golden bar divider

Subcategories
Grade
Rank
Campaign Disclosure Law
A
2
Electronic Filing Program
A+
1
Disclosure Content Accessibility
B+
14
Online Contextual & Technical Usability
C
16

Grading Process green cube Subcategory Weighting green cube Methodology green cube Glossary

golden bar divider

The State of Disclosure in Oregon

The passage of comprehensive campaign finance legislation in 2005 boosted Oregon from a C- and the 24th ranking in 2005 to a B+ and 3rd place overall in 2007. Oregon ranked higher in each scoring category and was the most improved state in 2007.

Oregon’s strengthened disclosure law earned an A and ranks second in the nation in 2007. Candidates must provide detailed information on all contributors over $100, including occupation and employer data. The new law also requires more frequent reporting by candidates, including additional last-minute reports. Expenditure disclosure is excellent, with all payments (including subvendor expenses) over $100 reported. All state-level candidates raising $2,000 are required to file disclosure reports electronically. The Secretary of State’s office has created the “Oregon Elections System for Tracking and Reporting” (ORESTAR), an innovative, web-based electronic filing and disclosure system launched in 2007.

Oregon’s new reporting system is unique in that transactions are reported continuously (other states require candidates to file periodic reports). The result in Oregon is immediate, ongoing disclosure of campaign data online. Along with the new reporting system, the Secretary of State’s web site now features a searchable campaign finance database of contributions and expenditures that allows users to easily find, sort and download disclosure data. The database search options could be enhanced by adding contributor zip code and employer fields, both of which can be accessed within the search results. Oregon provides excellent access to paper reports as well, and offers data on disk for $5.

Oregon’s grade in the Online Contextual and Technical Usability category rose from a D to a C in 2007 as the state improved its usability test performance. Testers found the site easy to understand and gave higher overall ratings than in 2005. However, there is room for improvement. The site does not provide a comprehensive explanation of the universe of data available online, nor specific instructions for using the ORESTAR database. Overviews of funds raised and spent by candidates in the 2006 elections are not available online; however, the site does provide thorough comparisons of campaign financing from 2000 through 2004.

Quick Fix: Add a page to the ORESTAR database search system describing which candidates’ campaign data is available, the time periods covered, and instructions for accessing the data online.

Editor’s Pick: Database search results are cleanly presented and can be sorted by column heading as well as downloaded. View image

Disclosure Agency: Secretary of State
Disclosure Web Site:
http://www.sos.state.or.us

View past summaries of this state

View another state's summary:

Back to the Grading State Disclosure home page


First published October 16, 2007
| Last updated October 17, 2007
copyright ©
Campaign Disclosure Project. All rights reserved.