Grading State Disclosure 2005 Logo Graphic

O h i o

Grade
Rank
B
10

golden bar divider

Subcategories
Grade
Rank
Campaign Disclosure Law
C+
26
Electronic Filing Program
A+
1
Disclosure Content Accessibility
A-
12
Online Contextual & Technical Usability
B-
7

Grading Process green cube Subcategory Weighting green cube Methodology green cube Glossary

golden bar divider

The State of Disclosure in Ohio

Ohio earned a B and a top ten ranking overall in 2007. The state made significant gains in the Online Contextual and Technical Usability category, jumping from a D+ to a B-.

Under Ohio law, candidates must report detailed information, including occupation and employer data, about contributors giving more than $100, and last-minute contributions must be reported before Election Day. Campaign expenditure details include accrued expenses, but subvendor payments are not disclosed. Independent expenditures must be reported, but last-minute independent expenditures are not disclosed until after Election Day. Both statewide and legislative candidates reaching a $10,000 threshold must file disclosure reports electronically. While the state does offer an electronic filing “hardship” exemption, very few candidates have claimed this hardship, and those who do must pay the cost of data-entering their paper reports.

Accessibility of campaign disclosure records is excellent in Ohio, with the state again achieving an A- in this category in 2007. The Ohio Secretary of State’s office continues to offer one of the best online databases of campaign finance records in the country, and gives site visitors many ways to search, sort and download itemized contributions and expenditures. All candidates’ disclosure reports are available online and can be either browsed or searched, with campaign data available as far back as 1990. 

Ohio’s disclosure web site became much more user-friendly following a redesign in 2005, earning the state a B- and a top ten ranking in the usability category in 2007. Testers found the site to be easier to understand and rated their experience on the site more favorably than before the redesign. Contextually, the site provides clear information about what data can be found online, and also gives site visitors the ability to easily compare finances across all campaigns from 1996 to the present. The Secretary of State’s office could improve the usability of the web site by labeling amended reports as such, and retaining the original filings.

Quick Fix: Add a note to the site instructions telling visitors that the database is capable of conducting “name starts with” searches and “name contains” searches if the user first enters the “ % ” character.

Editor’s Pick: Ohio’s searchable databases offer a wide range of search and output options. (View image) From the search interface, users can sort, download, and even select a font size for their search results. (View image)

Disclosure Agency: Secretary of State
Disclosure Web Site:
http://www.state.oh.us/sos

View past summaries of this state

View another state's summary:

Back to the Grading State Disclosure home page


First published October 16, 2007
| Last updated October 17, 2007
copyright ©
Campaign Disclosure Project. All rights reserved.