Grading State Disclosure 2005 Logo Graphic

N e w . Y o r k

Grade
Rank
B-
16

golden bar divider

Subcategories
Grade
Rank
Campaign Disclosure Law
C
36
Electronic Filing Program
A+
1
Disclosure Content Accessibility
A-
12
Online Contextual & Technical Usability
C+
10

Grading Process green cube Subcategory Weighting green cube Methodology green cube Glossary

golden bar divider

The State of Disclosure in New York

New York was among the five most improved states since the 2005 assessment, moving from 29th overall up to 16th while jumping from a D+ to a B- in 2007.

A closer examination of New York’s disclosure law in 2007 resulted in scoring revisions, causing the state’s grade to increase to a C from a D in 2005. Candidates must report the name and address of contributors who give $100 or more, but not occupation and employer data. Large, last-minute contributions are disclosed before Election Day. Details of expenditures over $49 must be disclosed, including subvendor information. Independent expenditures are reported, and the name of the candidate on whose behalf the expenditure is made must be disclosed. Candidates for both state and legislative offices who raise more than $1,000 must file their disclosure reports electronically. In addition to providing free filing software, the State Board of Elections has created a new, well-staffed electronic filing help desk to assist candidates.

Enhancements to the State Board of Elections’ web site in late 2005 accounted for the jump in New York’s data accessibility score to an A- from a C- since the last study. The addition of a searchable database of expenditures has greatly improved access to campaign data, allowing the public to search by specific payees, transaction dates and amounts. The state also enhanced the public’s ability to search itemized contribution data by adding more search fields, including donor zip code. Currently, the public can download large files of data containing records for entire filing periods; adding the ability to download smaller sets of data would be useful.

New York earned a C+ and top ten ranking in the Online Contextual and Technical Usability category in 2007, up from an F and a bottom ten ranking in 2005. The enhanced disclosure web site was well-received by usability testers in 2007, who were able to find information more quickly and reported higher levels of confidence than testers did in 2005. Lists of the aggregate amounts raised and spent by statewide and legislative candidates have been added to the site, complementing the wealth of contextual information that was already available, including candidate lists and a description of which reports and candidate filings are available online. Currently, reports are labeled in reference to a specific election (for example, “32 Day Pre-Primary Report”); adding the starting and ending dates of the reporting periods would provide the public with a clearer view of the time period covered by each report.

Quick Fix: Add the ability to search the expenditures database by expense code. 

Editor’s Pick: Each candidate’s report index page provides users with the ability to search that candidate’s specific contributors, or for all contributions above a certain amount. View image

Disclosure Agency: State Board of Elections
Disclosure Web Site:
http://www.elections.state.ny.us

View past summaries of this state

View another state's summary:

Back to the Grading State Disclosure home page


First published October 16, 2007
| Last updated October 17, 2007
copyright ©
Campaign Disclosure Project. All rights reserved.