Grading State Disclosure 2005 Logo Graphic

N e w . H a m p s h i r e

Grade
Rank
F
43

golden bar divider

Subcategories
Grade
Rank
Campaign Disclosure Law
B-
19
Electronic Filing Program
F
36
Disclosure Content Accessibility
F
48
Online Contextual & Technical Usability
F
49

Grading Process green cube Subcategory Weighting green cube Methodology green cube Glossary

golden bar divider

The State of Disclosure in New Hampshire

New Hampshire launched a voluntary electronic filing program for candidates in 2006, boosting the state’s ranking both in that category and overall, though the state still received an F in 2007.

New Hampshire again received a B- in the Campaign Disclosure Law category. Candidates are required to report details about contributors giving $25 or more, including occupation and employer data for those contributing more than $100. Disclosure of loan details is minimal, and expenditure reports do not include subvendor or accrued expenditures. Both last-minute contributions and independent expenditures must be reported prior to Election Day. After debuting a voluntary electronic filing program in 2006, the Secretary of State’s office determined that the usability and security of the system should be enhanced for future reporting; the program has been temporarily taken offline while these issues are addressed.

At present, access to campaign filings in New Hampshire is poor, as reflected in the state’s F for Disclosure Content Accessibility. Disclosure reports are still scanned but recent filings are posted as PDFs, an improvement over the past use of TIFF images that required special software to view. The site does not offer the ability to sort, download or search campaign data, and House candidates’ reports are not available online at all. This may change once the electronic filing system is operating again, since it previously featured a searchable campaign finance database.

Despite a new design, New Hampshire’s disclosure site still rated very poorly in 2007 in the area of Online Contextual and Technical Usability. The state again earned the lowest possible rating for the usability test in 2007, as testers continued to report an overall lack of confidence in the information on the site, confusion over terminology, and general dissatisfaction with their experience on the site. There is no overview information comparing candidates’ campaign finance activity, nor does the site provide a good explanation of which disclosure records are available online or how to access the data.

Quick Fix: Improve the public’s ability to find campaign finance information by making the link for “Receipts and Expenditures” more prominent, and possibly re-labeling that link as “View Campaign Receipts and Expenditures”.

Editor’s Pick: A chart showing spending limits and penalties for exceeding those limits. View image

Disclosure Agency: Department of State
Disclosure Web Site:
http://www.state.nh.us/sos

View past summaries of this state

View another state's summary:

Back to the Grading State Disclosure home page


First published October 16, 2007
| Last updated October 17, 2007
copyright ©
Campaign Disclosure Project. All rights reserved.