Grading State Disclosure 2005 Logo Graphic

N o r t h . D a k o t a

Grade
Rank
F
45

golden bar divider

Subcategories
Grade
Rank
Campaign Disclosure Law
F
50
Electronic Filing Program
F
41
Disclosure Content Accessibility
D+
28
Online Contextual & Technical Usability
C-
20

Grading Process green cube Subcategory Weighting green cube Methodology green cube Glossary

golden bar divider

The State of Disclosure in North Dakota

North Dakota has received an F in each of the four Grading State Disclosure studies. The state’s weak disclosure law, which has ranked last in each year’s study, and the lack of an electronic filing program continue to prevent the state from achieving a higher grade.

North Dakota law requires candidates to disclose detailed information about contributors giving over $200, including the aggregate amount given by each donor during a reporting period. Occupation and employer data for those contributing $5,000 or more is required. Last-minute contributions over $500 must be reported before Election Day. Unlike every other state in the nation, North Dakota does not require candidates to disclose campaign expenditures. Loans and independent expenditures are also not required to be reported. As a result of these deficiencies, North Dakota’s campaign disclosure law ranks as the weakest in the nation. Since the state legislature meets only once every two years, the next opportunity for any disclosure law improvements would be the 2009 session. The state did enact legislation in 2007 improving disclosure of political party convention financing, which may indicate a desire on the part of lawmakers to further strengthen disclosure laws. The state does not operate an electronic filing program, though the Secretary of State’s office continues to report that such a program is possible in the future if funding allows.

North Dakota’s grade in the accessibility category has not changed since 2005, though the state slipped three places in the rankings as other states improved. The Secretary of State’s office data-enters campaign reports filed by state-level candidates, resulting in clean displays of reports on the disclosure site. Along with the browsable candidate reports, the site features a comprehensive database of contributions that can be searched by donor name or zip code. The database does not allow searches by contribution amount or by a specific date. Search results can be downloaded, but cannot be sorted online. Along with the online data, the Secretary of State’s office offers data on disk and provides paper copies of reports for $.25 per page. 

Despite a small decline in the usability test results, the North Dakota Secretary of State’s site still ranked among the top performers in the 2007 test. Testers again expressed high levels of confidence in the accuracy of the data online, and gave the disclosure web site a very good overall rating. The site provides helpful information about campaign finance requirements and restrictions, as well as detailed lists of candidates. Amended disclosure reports are clearly labeled, though original reports are removed once amended. The site could be enhanced with a more detailed description of the data available online and instructions for using the search features.

Quick Fix: Provide an overview comparing fundraising between candidates in a single race.

Editor’s Pick: Simple, clean design of the Secretary of State’s disclosure web site. View image

Disclosure Agency: Secretary of State
Disclosure Web Site:
http://www.nd.gov/sos/

View past summaries of this state

View another state's summary:

Back to the Grading State Disclosure home page


First published October 16, 2007
| Last updated October 17, 2007
copyright ©
Campaign Disclosure Project. All rights reserved.