Grading State Disclosure 2005 Logo Graphic

M o n t a n a

Grade
Rank
F
47

golden bar divider

Subcategories
Grade
Rank
Campaign Disclosure Law
B+
9
Electronic Filing Program
F
41
Disclosure Content Accessibility
F
49
Online Contextual & Technical Usability
F
50

Grading Process green cube Subcategory Weighting green cube Methodology green cube Glossary

golden bar divider

The State of Disclosure in Montana

As one of only two states that does not currently offer any online access to campaign data, Montana can only earn an F in this assessment. Despite the low overall grade in 2007, Montana’s disclosure law is strong, and the state is poised to debut electronic filing and online access to records.

Candidates in Montana are required to disclose details, including occupation and employer data, about contributors giving $35 or more. Last-minute contributions are reported prior to Election Day, but last-minute independent expenditures are not. Expenditure disclosure includes the name of the vendor and transaction date, as well as accrued expenses. Subvendor details are not disclosed for campaign consultant expenditures. Other strengths in Montana’s law include the filing schedule, reporting of loan details, and enforcement provisions. While Montana currently has no electronic filing program, the office of the Commissioner of Political Practices is planning to introduce an electronic filing option for state-level candidates in 2008.

As noted above, Montana does not currently provide online access to any campaign finance data, resulting in the state’s poor performance in the accessibility category. Fortunately, the state is getting close to addressing this issue. A letter posted on the Commissioner’s site in January 2007 acknowledges that Montana is “lacking when it comes to on-line reporting and on-line disclosure of campaign financing. It’s something we’re working to change.” Evidence of this work is apparent: Montana debuted an online lobbyist disclosure program this year and searchable, downloadable campaign data is scheduled to come online in 2008 with the move to electronic filing. At present, the Commissioner’s office oversees an excellent program for making copies of paper-filed campaign reports accessible to the public. 

Montana received an F in the Online Contextual and Technical Usability category due to the absence of any campaign finance data on the state’s disclosure site. If the introduction of electronic filing results in the availability of data on its web site, the site’s usability will improve. The Commissioner’s cleanly designed and easily navigated site provides information about campaign finance laws and restrictions. To improve the site’s contextual information, the public would benefit from listings of candidates that include basic information (name, office/district sought, and party affiliation) as well as comparisons of total amounts raised and spent by candidates. Once disclosure data becomes available online, it is important that the public is given a clear description of the data available, as well as instructions for using the site’s new features.

Quick Fix: Provide a list of candidates on the Commissioner’s site. Currently, the site offers a link to the Secretary of State’s site where this information can be found, but it would be more helpful if this information were featured on the disclosure site.

Editor’s Pick: The Commissioner’s letter and the Office of Political Practices’ “Goals and Objectives” offer a clear, honest assessment of the state of disclosure in Montana View image and the steps being taken to bring disclosure data online. View image

Disclosure Agency: Commissioner of Political Practices
Disclosure Web Site:
http://politicalpractices.mt.gov

View past summaries of this state

View another state's summary:

Back to the Grading State Disclosure home page


First published October 16, 2007
| Last updated October 17, 2007
copyright ©
Campaign Disclosure Project. All rights reserved.