Grading State Disclosure 2005 Logo Graphic

M i s s i s s i p p i

Grade
Rank
F
46

golden bar divider

Subcategories
Grade
Rank
Campaign Disclosure Law
C-
37
Electronic Filing Program
F
41
Disclosure Content Accessibility
F
43
Online Contextual & Technical Usability
F
42

Grading Process green cube Subcategory Weighting green cube Methodology green cube Glossary

golden bar divider

The State of Disclosure in Mississippi

Mississippi has earned an F in each of the four Grading State Disclosure studies and this year dropped down to 46th overall in the rankings due to a decline in the state’s usability test performance.

Mississippi earned a C- again in 2007 in the Campaign Disclosure Law category. The state’s disclosure law requires candidates to report details, including occupation and employer data, about contributors giving in excess of $200. Contributions made at the last minute have to be reported prior to Election Day, but late independent expenditures do not. Candidates are required to report basic information about their expenses (such as payee and date made), but not subvendor payments, accrued expenditures, or descriptions of their expenses. Despite legislative attempts to mandate electronic filing, Mississippi lacks an electronic filing program. However, the state is in the process of developing a voluntary program for candidates, scheduled to begin in 2008.

Online access to campaign disclosure records is limited to scanned documents in Mississippi, earning the state an F again in 2007 in the accessibility category. The state’s main deficiency in the area of online disclosure is the lack of searchable databases of campaign contributions or expenses. Mississippi does post scanned files online quickly for all statewide and legislative candidates as far back as 1995, but since the data is found in static (and often large) PDF and TIFF files, locating specific contributions is difficult, and sorting or downloading data into a spreadsheet is not possible. While campaign data is not available on disk, the state does offer excellent access to paper copies of disclosure reports.

Mississippi performed poorly in the 2007 web site usability testing, dropping the state from a D to an F in the usability category. Testers had more trouble finding the disclosure site from the state’s homepage than in the past, and rated their overall experience on the site slightly lower than in 2005. Mississippi does provide a good amount of contextual information on its disclosure site, including candidate listings, descriptions of which reports are online, and details about reporting requirements and restrictions. The site does not provide information about the total amounts raised and spent by candidates for a particular office. The index of a candidate’s reports no longer allows the public to browse the name of contributors who made last-minute contributions, a feature that was highlighted in the 2005 assessment.

Quick Fix: Provide a list of the total amounts raised and spent by individual candidates for each office.

Editor’s Pick: A simple, informative “2007 Campaign Finance Reporting Schedule” is easily found on the site. View image

Disclosure Agency: Secretary of State
Disclosure Web Site:
http://www.sos.state.ms.us

View past summaries of this state

View another state's summary:

Back to the Grading State Disclosure home page


First published October 16, 2007
| Last updated October 17, 2007
copyright ©
Campaign Disclosure Project. All rights reserved.