Grading State Disclosure 2005 Logo Graphic

M i n n e s o t a

Grade
Rank
C+
19

golden bar divider

Subcategories
Grade
Rank
Campaign Disclosure Law
B+
10
Electronic Filing Program
F
36
Disclosure Content Accessibility
D+
28
Online Contextual & Technical Usability
A-
2

Grading Process green cube Subcategory Weighting green cube Methodology green cube Glossary

golden bar divider

The State of Disclosure in Minnesota

Minnesota’s grade improved to a C+ in 2007, due to an impressive jump from a D to an A- in the usability category since the 2005 study.

Minnesota’s disclosure law again earned a B+ and a top ten ranking in 2007. Candidates are required to report detailed information, including occupation and employer, for contributors giving $100 or more. Expenditure disclosure is excellent and includes subvendor details as well as accrued expenses, with every expense of $100 or more being reported. The law’s biggest shortcoming relates to its filing schedule (reports are filed less often than in many other states), though candidates must disclose large, last-minute contributions before Election Day. Electronic filing remains voluntary in Minnesota, and the state ranked 36th overall in this area in 2007. Minnesota offers free software for electronic filing, an option that was used by over 60 percent of legislative candidates and more than 40 percent of statewide candidates in 2006.

Minnesota’s grade in the Disclosure Content Accessibility category improved to a D+, up from an F in the 2005 study. The Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board now posts complete copies of scanned and electronically-filed disclosure reports to its web site in PDF format, providing online access to expenditure data for the first time. As in the past, all contribution data is entered into a searchable database, which now allows users to search by zip code and to sort results online. The database offers the ability to limit searches to a specific employer through a pull-down menu, but this can be confusing as employers can be listed multiple times depending on how information is recorded in the system (for example, “Air Care Go Inc” and “Air Care-Go, Inc.”).

The strongest gains were made in the web site usability category, earning Minnesota an A- and a huge jump in the rankings from 25th to 2nd in this area. Minnesota was one of four states to earn the highest usability test rating in 2007, as testers found the Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board web site easy to understand and rated their overall experience on the site much higher than in 2005. Not only has usability improved, but the contextual information online has also been expanded because full disclosure reports have been added to the site. The public can now more easily identify the time period covered by each report, as well as review both original and amended filings. These additions improved upon the contextual information already online, which includes disclosure requirements and restrictions, a glossary of campaign finance terms and summaries of campaign spending going back to 1998.

Quick Fix: Provide information explaining what data is available online, including which candidates and time periods are covered in the site.

Editor’s Pick: The “Campaign Finance - Glossary of Terms” defines the key terms used within the state’s disclosure law and throughout the disclosure site. View image

Disclosure Agency: Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board
Disclosure Web Site:
http://www.cfboard.state.mn.us

View past summaries of this state

View another state's summary:

Back to the Grading State Disclosure home page


First published October 16, 2007
| Last updated October 17, 2007
copyright ©
Campaign Disclosure Project. All rights reserved.