Grading State Disclosure 2005 Logo Graphic

M a s s a c h u s e t t s

Grade
Rank
B
13

golden bar divider

Subcategories
Grade
Rank
Campaign Disclosure Law
C-
37
Electronic Filing Program
A+
1
Disclosure Content Accessibility
B
19
Online Contextual & Technical Usability
A-
2

Grading Process green cube Subcategory Weighting green cube Methodology green cube Glossary

golden bar divider

The State of Disclosure in Massachusetts

With a stronger performance in the area of web site usability this year, Massachusetts climbed into the B range in 2007 for the first time. Massachusetts earned grades in the A range in both the usability and Electronic Filing categories.

The state’s weakest area is its campaign disclosure law, which earned a C- in 2007. Massachusetts requires candidates to report details for contributors giving at least $50, including occupation and employer data for those contributing $200 or more. Expenditures above $50 are reported, but details about subvendor payments are not required. Independent expenditures must be disclosed, but there is no pre-election reporting of either last-minute independent expenditures or contributions. Massachusetts has an excellent electronic filing program and shares the top ranking in this category. With a mandatory program for all statewide candidates who raise or spend $50,000 within an election cycle and a $5,000 threshold for legislative candidates, nearly all candidates in Massachusetts must file disclosure reports electronically.

Little has changed in terms of the public’s ability to access candidate campaign finance data in Massachusetts since 2005. The state again earned a B and remained in the top 20 overall in the Disclosure Content Accessibility category. The Office of Campaign and Political Finance (OCPF) provides good access to campaign records online through searchable databases of contributions and expenditures, as well as complete filings that can be browsed online. To make the system even more complete, the agency could add data from paper-filed reports to its databases, and give site users the ability to search by contributor zip code, expenditure amount, and expenditure purpose, all of which are included in the search results. The OCPF site contains instructions for accessing campaign data online or in person, as well as for requesting copies of reports by mail.

Higher performance on the usability test in 2007 earned Massachusetts a second place ranking and an A- in the usability category. Testers reported a more positive experience with the site than in 2005, along with higher levels of confidence in the accuracy of the data they found. The OCPF continues to offer excellent contextual information to site visitors, including overviews of total funds raised and spent by candidates and a detailed explanation of the contents of the databases. The OCPF could enhance the candidate listings on the site by organizing the lists by year and office sought, rather than listing all registered candidates by last name.

Quick Fix: Allow users to search the contributions database by zip code and the expenditures database by amount and expenditure purpose.

Editor’s Pick: The “Electronic Report Log” lists the most recently filed reports, allowing the public and the media to track campaign data as soon as it becomes available. View image

Disclosure Agency: Office of Campaign and Political Finance
Disclosure Web Site:
http://www.state.ma.us/ocpf

View past summaries of this state

View another state's summary:

Back to the Grading State Disclosure home page


First published October 16, 2007
| Last updated October 17, 2007
copyright ©
Campaign Disclosure Project. All rights reserved.