Grading State Disclosure 2005 Logo Graphic

I d a h o

Grade
Rank
C
26

golden bar divider

Subcategories
Grade
Rank
Campaign Disclosure Law
B-
22
Electronic Filing Program
F
41
Disclosure Content Accessibility
C
27
Online Contextual & Technical Usability
A+
1

Grading Process green cube Subcategory Weighting green cube Methodology green cube Glossary

golden bar divider

The State of Disclosure in Idaho

Idaho earned a C in 2007, though the state dropped six places in the rankings as other states made significant improvements. Idaho’s strengths continue to be in the Online Contextual and Technical Usability category, where the state earned an A+ and maintained its status as the top ranked state in 2007.

Idaho earned a B- in the disclosure law category, the same grade earned in the previous two assessments. Idaho requires candidates to report details about contributors giving more than $50 and expenditures of at least $25. Expenditure disclosure is particularly strong and requires reporting of information about subvendors and accrued expenses. Last-minute contributions and independent expenditures must be reported before Election Day, and the law’s enforcement provisions, including mandatory desk reviews and field audits, are strong. Idaho still does not offer an electronic filing option, but the Secretary of State’s office reports that it is designing a system for candidates.

Idaho improved slightly in the Disclosure Content Accessibility category, earning a C in 2007 and ranking higher than 23 states (including 14 with electronic filing programs). The Secretary of State’s office manually enters all campaign finance data, making itemized contributions available through a database in both searchable and downloadable formats. Idaho added a zip code search option to its contributions database, but users still cannot sort the data online. The site’s primary deficiency remains the lack of an interface for searching campaign expenditures, though this data is also manually entered. Idaho makes disclosure reports available almost immediately by posting scans of reports online the same day they are received. Making reports available for the searchable database and download options takes slightly longer, but the process for manual data-entry is usually completed in seven days.

Idaho maintained its 1st place ranking in the usability category in 2007. Idaho’s performance on the usability test earned the highest possible rating, accounting for the jump from an A to an A+ since 2005. The Secretary of State’s site is easy to navigate and contains thorough descriptions of the data available, as well as how to access it. The site also contains very clear summaries of the totals raised and spent by candidates from 1994 to present, providing site visitors with an excellent view of Idaho’s campaign financing trends.

Quick Fix: Allow site visitors to sort contribution data online, either through the contribution search interface or on the search results page. 

Editor’s Pick: Summary reports displaying totals raised and spent by all candidates from 1994 to present. View image

Disclosure Agency: Secretary of State
Disclosure Web Site:
http://www.idsos.state.id.us

View past summaries of this state

View another state's summary:

Back to the Grading State Disclosure home page


First published October 16, 2007
| Last updated November 17, 2007
copyright ©
Campaign Disclosure Project. All rights reserved.