Grading State Disclosure 2005 Logo Graphic

G e o r g i a

Grade
Rank
B
8

golden bar divider

Subcategories
Grade
Rank
Campaign Disclosure Law
B+
7
Electronic Filing Program
A+
1
Disclosure Content Accessibility
B+
14
Online Contextual & Technical Usability
C-
22

Grading Process green cube Subcategory Weighting green cube Methodology green cube Glossary

golden bar divider

The State of Disclosure in Georgia

Even as disclosure responsibilities were transferred to the State Ethics Commission in January of 2006, Georgia maintained its excellent disclosure program, again earning a B and a top-ten ranking.

Georgia’s disclosure law earned a B+ again in 2007, led by strong reporting requirements for individual contributors and independent expenditures. Candidates must report details about all contributors giving more than $100, including occupation and employer data. Large, last-minute contributions and independent expenditures must be reported prior to an election. Expenditures over $100 are also reported, but committees are not required to list subvendor information. Georgia law requires statewide candidates who raise $20,000 and legislative candidates who raise $10,000 to file electronically. The State Ethics Commission provides candidates with a free, web-based filing system, online demonstrations and training programs. These factors helped Georgia earn an A+ and a share of the number one ranking in the Electronic Filing category.

Georgia’s grade in the data accessibility category dipped slightly after the transition to the new site, from an A- to a B+. Regardless of filing method, all itemized disclosure data filed since January 2006 can be accessed through the Commission’s searchable databases of contributions and expenditures, due to the fact that the agency data-enters paper-filed reports. The new databases now allow users to search expenditures by purpose and date, but contributions cannot be searched by zip code as they could be in the previous database. Users cannot sort data on the site, but are able to download information for offline research. Electronic filings are immediately available online, and Georgia helps keep the public up to date by providing a list of the fifty reports most recently filed.

Georgia climbed into the C range in the Online Contextual and Technical Usability category in 2007, up from a D+ in 2005. (The Commission redesigned its web site in August of 2007, after the assessment was completed.) The state improved information on campaign restrictions and disclosure requirements on its site and was one of four states to earn the highest possible rating in the 2007 usability test. Though the site is overall very user-friendly, it lacks key contextual information, such as a detailed listing of candidates. Reports filed prior to 2006 are still accessible on the Secretary of State’s web site, but the Ethics Commission’s new site, with information since 2006, does not provide a link to the historic data. While the Commission does summarize cumulative funds raised and spent by all filers, the public would also benefit from comparisons of the totals raised and spent by candidates for a particular office.

Quick Fix: Add an explanation to the site describing what campaign finance information is available on the Ethics Commission site and what data is available on the Secretary of State’s site.

Editor’s Pick: The Commission provides a list of the 50 most recently filed reports. View image

Disclosure Agency: State Ethics Commission
Disclosure Web Site:
http://www.ethics.georgia.gov

View past summaries of this state

View another state's summary:

Back to the Grading State Disclosure home page


First published October 16, 2007
| Last updated October 17, 2007
copyright ©
Campaign Disclosure Project. All rights reserved.